Analyzing U.S. Security Doctrine Against Threats by Non-State Violent Actors
Analyzing U.S. Security Doctrine Against Threats by Non-State Violent Actors
???? International Radar | Source: West Point CTC and Washington Institute for Near East Policy
The Global Threat
Data from the West Point Combating Terrorism Center and the Washington Institute reveal new threats to global and European security. Their focus on foreign fighters in Syria underscores integration or detention challenges amid ongoing warfare. They also elaborated on the goals and tactics of violent non-state actors, including artificial intelligence usage and links to cartels, sparking widespread concern over the compounded challenges of national and international border security.
German Implication
These studies create a complex portrayal of domestic and international security. Returning foreign fighters to Europe, particularly Germany, poses a clear threat to public safety. Increasing violent actors’ capabilities to leverage artificial intelligence endanger critical infrastructure and communications, while cartels have expanded operations smuggling goods and drugs into Europe. From a German perspective, developments in the Sahel region and escalating operations in Syria could trigger unprecedented migration flows and place significant stress on domestic intelligence operations.
Doctrine Directives
- ????️ Enhance technological readiness and develop counter-AI tools to combat advanced technologies employed by violent groups.
- ????️ Strengthen intelligence-sharing with Syria’s neighboring regions and the Sahel to effectively monitor suspicious activities.
- ????️ Invest in more robust rehabilitation and reintegration programs for detained foreign fighters, while enforcing thorough monitoring of potential risks.
The Blind Spot
These studies fail to adequately address the role of social networks in facilitating communication and recruitment through digital platforms, which may amplify emerging threats.
