A proposed sugar tax by the government is under fire for including zero-sugar drinks in its scope, sparking criticism from opposition parties and industry figures.

The government’s plans for a new sugar tax have drawn sharp criticism after it was revealed the measure would include not only sugary beverages but also drinks containing artificial sweeteners. The blueprint, outlined in a policy document, suggests taxing beverages with as little as 4.5 grams of sugar per 100 milliliters, as well as zero-sugar products such as diet sodas. Critics argue that this expansion undermines the original purpose of discouraging excessive sugar consumption.

The proposal has faced backlash from multiple political quarters. The Free Democratic Party (FDP) called the tax a broken promise, arguing that funds would no longer be earmarked for health initiatives but directed into the general budget instead. The Left Party also voiced opposition, labeling the inclusion of zero-sugar drinks as counterproductive to public health goals. Politicians and lobbyists have criticized the broader impact on consumers and manufacturers, noting discrepancies in how products like non-alcoholic beverages and dairy drinks would be taxed compared to other items such as beer.

A government-appointed commission had initially recommended a tiered sugar tax, with rates varying based on sugar content, to encourage healthier consumption patterns. However, the revised scope has sparked concerns that the tax’s purpose is being diluted. Some industry stakeholders have warned of adverse economic effects and questioned the practicality of the proposed measures. While government leaders have stressed that the policy remains a draft, critics are urging significant revisions to align with the tax’s original intent.